PM Modi Questions NCERT Chapter Accountability

PM Modi Questions NCERT Chapter Accountability

Last Updated Feb - 28 - 2026, 01:36 PM | Source : Fela News | Visitors : 5

Prime Minister Narendra Modi raises concern over controversial Class 8 NCERT textbook content.

A fresh controversy has emerged over a chapter included in a Class 8 Social Science textbook published by the National Council of Educational Research and Training. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reportedly expressed displeasure over references to judicial corruption in the book, and senior officials are now discussing how such content was approved.

The issue began when a chapter described challenges within the Indian judiciary, including references to corruption, case backlogs and shortage of judges. While some educators argue that students should understand institutional challenges in a democracy, others felt that the language used was not appropriate for young learners. The matter eventually reached the Supreme Court, which raised strong objections and emphasized that educational material should not undermine public trust in constitutional institutions.

Prime Minister Modi is said to have questioned how the chapter cleared the review process. He reportedly asked what checks were in place and why accountability mechanisms did not prevent controversial content from being included. According to government sources, he stressed that responsibility must be fixed so that similar lapses do not happen again.

Following the backlash, the textbook was withdrawn and authorities indicated that revisions would be made. Education officials have suggested that a review of the editorial and approval process may be conducted. The aim, according to sources, is to ensure that future educational content goes through stricter scrutiny before publication.

Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan also expressed regret over the situation and assured that corrective steps would be taken. The episode has opened a broader discussion about how textbooks are written and reviewed, especially when they deal with sensitive institutions like the judiciary.

Public reaction has been mixed. Some believe students should learn about real issues in governance, even if they are uncomfortable. Others argue that such discussions must be handled carefully and framed in a balanced manner suitable for school level understanding.

The controversy highlights the delicate balance between academic freedom and institutional respect. As authorities examine the matter further, it remains to be seen how textbook policies might evolve to prevent similar disputes in the future.

Share :